DIVERSITY,
FORENSICS, AND SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
Sarah Chan, San Jose State University
with a few updates by Jim Hanson
I
attended San Jose State University. At the time, I had recently graduated from
Leland High School in Almaden Valley. My grades and SAT scores were high enough
to enable me to leave the home I had grown up in, but my academic interest in
occupational therapy convinced me to stay in San Jose. Because I was staying at
home, I felt a little abandoned because the friends I had known for years were
all leaving. It was this loss of a community that led me to seek out a new
community, a new home.
I
found my new home with the SJSU forensics team, even though I was never
involved in forensics in high school. One of my instructors, Annabel Forbes,
was also the assistant director of forensics, and she and one of my co-workers
at the tutorial center, Jose Jimenez, convinced me to join the team. A friend
of mine, Tony Rubolino, also decided to join, and he convinced me to debate
with him. Unfortunately, he quit before we started competing, but by that time,
I was at home and in love with the activity.
During
that first year, I did not realize how diverse our team was, although I knew
that we were an eclectic group: a couple of Asian males, two African-American
females, a gay Latino, a white male every so often, a white female, and myself,
an Asian female. It was not until summer when I went to a debate camp that I
realized how unusual this diversity was in the rest of the forensics community.
It was there that I had the first realization that white males are the majority
of people involved in forensics. Most of them are from middle to upper class
families and go to school full-time and do not need to work. In contrast, the
majority of our team works part-time, some even work full-time. Many
competitors also receive forensics scholarships, although none of my teammates
do.
As
the year started, I began posting semi-regularly to the electronic listserv,(1)
the CEDA-L, which eventually became known as eDebate, short for electronic
debate. There were numerous discussions about diversity, and I always wondered
whether our team truly was an anomaly. I constantly reminded people in the
larger debate community that diversity does exist in our community, but we must
work to increase our diversity by reaching out to non-traditional debaters. I
argued with people who said that college is not a place to train new debaters,
and pointed out that our team's success was the result of diversity. If we
limited ourselves to white males, we would only have a handful of competitors.
But instead, our coaching staff has constantly worked to include as many people
as possible, which brought in new talent and experiences which we were able to
share with each other.
We
recruited more people, replacing those who had graduated. More white males were
competing, but our team was still mostly women. My new partner was a black
male, and we had many more non-traditional students whose ages ranged from 18
to 29 years old. We got a new assistant, Shar Gregg, who was white, like
Annabel and director of forensics Genelle Austin-Lett.
This
diversity is the springboard for my paper. I am interested in the history of
this unique community: how we managed to come together, why we came, why we
stayed. I am interested in learning why our team is so different from so many
other programs.
The
forensics team is constantly changing. Often it is difficult to determine who
is actually on the team at any given time. Because of this, the narratives that
follow will be from members who have competed during my third year on the team.
While this excludes those who may be practicing and enrolled in forensics
units, it is the only way to take a semi-accurate "snapshot" of the
team.(2) Currently, the three assistant coaches are white males, and there are
9 females and 7 males who have competed. These are our stories.
"Muddled"
is how Jean Battiato describes her ethnic background. "My mother's term is
San Josean. I'm mostly European, Italian, but some of
who-knows-where-it-came-from is there too." A twenty-two-year-old
communication studies major, Jean has been on the forensics team the longest.
"In
fifth grade, I had to write a speech on my heritage, and I was told it was
college level. Then in my junior year of high school, I joined the team at
Presentation. I qualified for the state championship, but I didn't go. Four
years ago, during my first semester at San Jose State, I was in Annabel's Comm
20 class. After I gave my intro speech, she said I should join the team.
"After
15 years in theater, (I love performing), I was sick of the cattiness, hours,
and people, and I wanted out of the corner. Oral interp allows you to be your
own characters and perform in front of people the way you want to. Someone
doesn't tell me I can't do it that way.
"I
don't know what I get out of forensics, I never thought about it. But with my
learning disability, forensics has helped me to organize my thoughts better and
speak them in front of others."
Twenty-two-year-old
Jayme Maltbie, a communication studies major, is Caucasian, with a Sicilian
mother and a Scots-Irish father.
"I
was in Annabel's Argumentation and Advocacy class, and I'd always been
interested in forensics," she said. "At Sonoma State, my roommate was
on the Santa Rosa Junior College forensics team, but I left before I got a
chance to join.
"There
are two different dimensions to forensics. First, there's the education level:
critical thinking, the improved ability to articulate my self and my ideas in a
concise manner. I would recommend it to anybody because it has helped me
develop my thinking about world issues, form my morality because you have to
take sides you would not support and helps me understand why I believe what I
do. My personal beliefs have really evolved. I'd had philosophy through classes
but I didn't understand how to use it before.
"Also,
by and large and this is not 100% true, but I'm socially compatible with most
people on the team. For the first time, I felt like I really belonged, and that
I had things in common with people. I wasn't the freak. Also, people are really
supportive. Even in the rest of the community outside of rounds we can all
relax togther.
"As
for what I get out of forensics, you can cross-apply what I enjoy. In addition,
I get cool vocabularly like parametricize."
Our
engineering major, Aaron Fischer, is twenty-one and Norwegian. He was in a high
school debate class and actually looked for a debate team at SJSU but could not
find it. When he had Annabel as a sophomore, he joined the team.
"What
is there to like?" Aaron asked. "Well, you get to go off, think on
the spot, put ideas into something that sounds presentable. You also get more
comfortable speaking in front of people."
Marcus
Walton is twenty-seven, is a journalism major, and describes his ethnic
background as black. A high school teacher recommended that he try debating,
and then he debated at Contra Costa Junior College for a couple tournaments. I
met Marcus on the Spartan Daily staff and when I learned that he had some
debate experience, I pestered him for a year before he agreed to join the team.
"I came back because I didn't get all I thought I could get out of
it," he said.
"I
like the intellectual stimulation and the competitiveness from not being
allowed to play sports when I was a little kid. Plus there's the people, and
being part of a team. That's what I get out of it."
"I'm
Central-American, Hispanic," says twenty-year-old Melissa Paredes, a
computer science major. "I did a few speech contests when I was a junior
and senior in high school and then I took Public Speaking. Shar came recruiting
and she was persuasive, but it wasn't until I came to the office when Genelle
and Shar convinced me to do it.
"I
like competing and all the stuff I learn (from my own research and from other
people's and what they think). I learn to think on my feet and be clear when
I'm explaining things. I explain myself better and use information now."
After
much discussion about what "ethnicity" means, twenty-two-year-old
Alex Kramer finally described himself as Dutch. This communication studies
major first became involved in forensics in high school because he needed an
oral communication class, and going to tournaments was worth extra credit.
"I did little bits here and there, policy, Lincoln-Douglas,(3) Congress
(4) but at DeAnza, there wasn't any forensics.
"Even
as a comm major, I didn't know San Jose State had a team until Shar came to my
rhetoric class, and I thought I'd check it out. I spent a half an hour talking
with Shar, and she can be quite persuasive.
"For
the most part, forensics is a really good group of people. There's not much
competition within the team. It really helps with thinking on your feet when
talking to people. Not just formulating ideas, but also arguments, and linking
them together and thinking critically. I've also gained comfort in front of an
audience."
"I'm
Armenian, which is considered white, Eastern-European, but I don't see myself
as Anglo," said Taveed Makdessian, a twenty-year-old political science
major. "Most of my family friends are Middle Eastern, and that's who I
identify with.
"I
was in Shar's Comm 20 class, and I gave two pretty good speeches, so she said I
should join the team. It's not a big deal to get up and talk in front of other
people.
"I
like CEDA5 because of the intensity in the middle of the round. Plus the people
on the team and on the circuit are cool, and I get the experience of meeting
people, and you learn. I get a lot of debate - information on current topics,
and it looks good. You get a lot of people skills."
Philip
Jang, 19, is Asian-American, Chinese to be specific. Like many others, he also
heard about forensics through Shar. "I was trying to get into her class,
and she mentioned forensics. I had done individual events in high school
because my sister wanted to take a summer class which I took with her and I
found I liked it. After that, I joined the team and we got to go all over the
country, including Hawaii.
"I
like it because it's good education, my vocabulary is better, and I can think
easier and quicker. I really gain knowledge and understanding of the world
around me."
Andrew
Joice, a twenty-two-year-old communication studies major, describes himself as
a mutt. "There's some German, Norwegian, Polish, and English, as in Great
Britain," he said.
"I
took Genelle's debate class, and she said we could go out and compete or take
the final. Since I'm not really a study or test-taking type, I chose to
compete, and I really enjoyed it so I kept on going.
"I
like the fact that you get to work with a partner, especially since I like to
talk to people. I've had cool partners so we really get to bounce ideas off
each other. It's also a really good team. You can talk to anyone about other
stuff, everyone offers information, and they're really supportive. The team
morale is also high. I'm happy when I hear that my teammates are doing well,
and it lifts me up.
"Overall,
I get a good feeling of accomplishment and achievement, especially when I get
to bring a trophy home and have it on display. It's also cool because the team
is just like a big group of friends having fun."
Angie
Higgins, 19, describes herself as mostly European, white. "There is some
Native American, not very much though," she said.
"I
was in Genelle's class last year, and I enjoyed it. I'm interested in drama and
after I saw the colloquium, I decided to join.
"I
really like the support of the group, even though I'm doing individual events,
everyone is supportive. It's a good learning experience, just being around
other people.
"I've
been able to overcome my fear of getting up in front of people I don't know,
knowing someone is judging me. I've gained more confidence each time,
overcoming my fear just by getting experience."
Anna
Zapata, 20, is Filipino. "I joined forensics because of Melissa," she
said. The two of them compete in duo interpretation6 together, and Anna also
does impromptu.7
"I
really like how the team is a family, and I get great speaking skills,"
she said. She is currently exploring other individual events in order to decide
what else she wants to attempt.
Twenty-two-year-old
Stacie Pettigrew is a Caucasian criminal justice major. "Shar got me
thinking about forensics when we were both in Interviewing together and then I
just came to the first meeting this year.
"I
like debate when I do come up with arguments, they're logical, and I know I've
made a good argument. I had a lot of fun at Northridge, and I liked helping
Melissa find evidence.
"Forensics
has definately helped me feel comfortable speaking in front of other people. I
didn't even feel butterflies, and that's not me at all. I didn't even think
about it until later when I was talking to someone else about it. I just don't
feel as intimidated anymore."
Sean
Swensson, 29, is an industrial design major. He is twenty-five percent Swedish
and says that a major bulk is European but he does not really know what
specifically.
"When
I took basic public speaking, I realized that as bad as I was, I could scare
and affect the audience, and I really liked that. The second semester the
teacher talked about forensics, and I decided to join. As my coach, she said
that I was the last person she expected to join.
"I
was really quiet so forensics has made me more comfortable talking to people,
but the biggest thing was that I only used to watch movies, and I hated reading
books. At first, my coach helped by giving me stuff to interpret, but then I
started having to find my own stuff. Watching other competitors made me realize
that literature can be entertaining. There are a lot of authors that suck so
you have to wade through everything to find the good ones. Some of them really
spoke to me. Now I read books more and go to libraries and bookstores to find
stuff. I also learned about the power of literature. A sentence can be said a
million different ways and it brings English to a whole knew level.
"I
really like the ability to affect my audience, to make them think and and feel
a certain way. I like how forensics has made me a better communicator, the
comraderie with people who have a similar goal, and learning that it's okay to
let people know who we are, just laying it on the line."
Cheri
Griffith-Moore, a twenty-year-old African-American, is a communication studies
major. "I came to SJSU as a comm major. A friend of mine said that it
would be beneficial since I want to go into law and that it would probably be a
lot more fun than political science, and it is. She had done forensics and
really encouraged me to get involved.
"I
like forensics because it encourages me to use whatever communication skills
I've acquired and to practice them. I also really like the people so even if I
don't stay with CEDA, I still want to participate in forensics."
These
conversations with my teammates have confirmed my beliefs and the beliefs of
several coaches in the debate community that forensics is a valuable experience,
regardless of ethnicity, age, or background. Common themes, the education,
enjoyment, and community, filled our conversations as we reflected upon the
benefits of forensics and the reasons we have chosen to continue competing.
The
diversity we have is somewhat by accident, but at the same time it is almost
intentional. Unlike many programs, instead of recruiting top high school
debaters (who are predominately white and male), we recruit from public
speaking classes which are very diverse. In this way, the "accident"
is created because we do not attempt to appeal to any one ethnic background. As
a result, the fact that various ethnicities have joined the forensics team is
very telling. Forensics does not appeal to any one type of person; there is no universal
ethnic group, age group, gender, or major area of study.
Sometimes
I wonder what it would be like to work with coaches from different ethnic
backgrounds and genders. I've had two CEDA coaches, Bill Wisneski and Dave
Schoenthal (who also happened to be debate former debate partners), who had
more experience than me. Shar had gone to one tournament in CEDA, and our
current coach, Scott Millward, does not have a debate background. Even friends
(debaters and coaches) whom I consult with are all white males. However, these
thoughts are usually fleeting as I focus on the present.
I
hope that I am making a difference. There are very few women of color who
debate, even fewer teams where neither debater is white. I am aware that other
people may pay more attention to what I do because I am a woman and because I
am Asian. As I work with my debaters, as I talk to other female debaters who
come up to me after watching me debate, as I interact with others in the
community, I want to make a difference, if only a little bit, in a small
attempt to give back to forensics what it has given to me.
There
are so many things that I like about forensics. It has taught me to think
quickly on my feet and helped me analyzes issues more deeply. But beyond
education, I have found a group of people, joined only by their interest in
forensics, care about each other and are supportive, not only with forensics
but with other issues as well.
In
addition, because I have been coaching the CEDA team, I have learned incredible
amounts about teaching others, gaining a unique perspective about debate that
has shaped the way I compete. No longer is it just about arguments, but it has
become a part of sharing who I am and what is important to me.
1 A listserv is an electronic mailing list
which allows subscribers to send messages to everyone on the list. The list has
nearly 1,000 members.
2 Many people "hang out" with the
team, without actively participating, others have competed in the past and may
compete again, and still others have not quite decided if they are going to
join the team. While talking to my teammates about my dilemma determining who
was competing and who was not, we agreed that the easiest way to answer this
question was to look at who had actually competed.
3 Lincoln-Douglas is an individual debate
event. In high school, they have value resolutions which change every semester,
but they do research and prepare their speeches in advance.
4 Congress is a high school event where
students speak about bills.
5 CEDA stands for Cross Examination Debate
Association. CEDA debaters compete on two-person teams on a policy topic.
6 Duo interpetation is considered an
individual event. The competitors interpret a piece, reading the selection in
different voices as they play different characters and using various gestures.
7 Impromptu competitors choose a topic from
the three they are given and have seven minutes to prepare and present a
speech.