![]() |
Breaking Down Barriers: Ask Jim about Debate |
You can submit questions too, just email Jim at hansonjb@whitman.edu
First, you can run them both. For example, some teams do the following:
Counterplan: Delay enacting the plan until after the Presidential elections.
Disadvantage: Enacting the plan now will hurt Clinton's chance of being elected President; Bob Dole being elected will cause harmful consequences.
Second, you should always run a disadvantage unless your judge hates them (a rare occasion). In many cases, your judges will not like generic disadvantages. When that happens, you should run a more specific disadvantage or try to stay focused on defeating the affirmative advantage.
Third, if you run a counterplan, you should run a disadvantage to the affirmative plan to show that your counterplan is superior to the affirmative plan.
Thanks to Andy for this question.
Jim