ARGUMENT IN
CONTEXT
A Comprehensive College Argumentation Textbook
Jim Hanson, Lead Author
Professor of Rhetoric, Whitman
College
Has taught 16
College Argumentation courses.
Has taught Rhetoric
and Debate at the College level for 25 years with very high student ratings.
Author of a Debate
Textbook and an Individual Events Textbook.
Author of multiple
NCA convention, Alta, and other academic articles including a recent Free Speech Yearbook article.

WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT ARGUMENT IN CONTEXT?
CAN I SEE PREVIEWS OF THE TEXTBOOK?
SECTION 1: KEY CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENT
SECTION 2: ARGUMENT IN PRACTICE
SECTION 3: ARGUMENT THEORY IN
CONTEMPORARY CONTEXTS
1. COVERS THE BASICS Argument in Context provides basic
argument principles such as the Toulmin Model of
Argument, Sound reasoning, Logical fallacies, Spheres of Argument, etc.
2. COVERS ARGUMENT IN PRACTICE Argument in Context provides
instruction in argumentation in a multitude of contexts: Political campaigning,
Legal arguments, Internet argumentation, and many other contexts.
3. LOW PRICE Argument in Context is dramatically
lower priced. The textbook costs $5 per
student with a minimum order of 12.
4. EASY TO ACCESS Argument in Context is provided
electronically. You and all of your students can access the textbook
immediately using a PDF reader.
5. DEBATE INSTRUCTION Argument in Context provides access
to comprehensive instruction in academic debate (Policy and Parliamentary
formats).
6. TEACHING MATERIALS Argument in Context provides Teacher
Materials including lecture notes and suggested syllabus. Provided
in MS Word format for easy editing.
7. LATEST THEORIES Argument in Context covers
contemporary challenges to argument such as power relations, gender studies,
sociality, and post-structuralism.
West Coast
Publishing, in business for nearly 20 years providing speech and debate
materials, makes purchasing and accessing the Textbook easy. www.wcdebate.com
STUDENTS BUY DIRECT WAY TO PURCHASE
1. You’ll
provide numbers of students in your class (teachers and teacher assistants
receive access free with orders of 12 or more).
2. You
collect money from students and mail it to West Coast Publishing.
3. Each
time your purchase, you are guaranteed the same rate ($5 per student) for 4
years (for you and your school) unless we note that a price increase will go
into effect 4 years from the last time you purchased. We do not plan any
significant price increases—we want this to be an affordable text.
4. West Coast
Publishing provides you an access code via email; just give that to your
students and they are ready to go. Students type in the username and password
and then have access to the textbook—no further codes or other restrictions.
BOOKSTORE WAY TO PURCHASE
1. Have
your bookstore contact us at wcdebate@aol.com
or fax us at 1-877-781-5058 or mail us at West Coast Publishing; PO Box 8066;
Fountain Valley CA 92728-8066.
2. We will
provide purchase cards with access codes to the textbook.
3. Students
then, just go to the bookstore and purchase the access
code card and they are ready to go.
We expect that you will
not order the textbook just once and then keep using it without compensating us
the $5 per student fee that is expected. That would not be fair to the
thousands of dollars and hundreds and hundreds of hours that we have (and will)
put into this textbook.
Email Jim
Hanson if you have any questions. hansonjb@gmail.com
Yes.
Sample of the Book
Sample of the Teacher Materials
If you want to see
more and you are genuinely interested in using the text for your class or own
use:
Email Jim at hansonjb@gmail.com
1. You can order
the textbook now at www.wcdebate.com
2. You can
begin using Argument in Context now.
SECTION 1 WAS POSTED MONDAY, AUGUST
16, 2010 and updated SEPT 7, 2011.
SECTION 2 WAS POSTED SUNDAY, AUGUST
29, 2010.
SECTION 3, WAS POSTED SEPT 7, 2011.
NEW TEACHING MATERIALS AND
POWERPOINTS ARE PLANNED FOR 2012.
This
is an outline of what is included in the Textbook.
Also
note: You have access to Breaking Down Barriers: How to Debate (Policy
and Parli Debating)—which provides basic and more
advanced instruction in academic debating—along with the comprehensive Dictionary
of Forensics (approximately 700 pages of materials).
1-1
INTRO TO ARGUMENT
Definition of Argument
Benefits of Argumentation
Supporting Arguments
Argument Type 1, 2, and 0
Supporting your Argument Type 0:
Constructing Arguments
Supporting your Argument Type 1:
Logos, Pathos, Ethos
Supporting your Argument Type 2:
Responding to Arguments
Perspectives on argument: logic,
dialectic and rhetoric
Argument comes in diverse forms
1-2
FORMAL LOGIC
What Formal Logic Seeks
The Syllogism
Syllogisms – Truth Testing
Syllogisms - Validity Testing
Parts of a Syllogism
Five Tests of Validity
Examples of Testing
1-3
RHETORICAL LOGIC
Values, Arguers, Spheres
Formal Logic versus Rhetorical Arg
Argument and Persuasion
The Enthymeme
Toulmin Model of
Argument
Argument Fields, Communities, and
Spheres
Perelman and Audiences
The Narrative Paradigm
1-4
DIALECTICAL LOGIC
Dialectical Questioning
Dialectical Point and Counterpoint
Pragma –Dialectics
Common Ground
Imre Lakatos’ Refutational Process
Casuistry
The Rational and the Reasonable
1-5
PREPARING GOOD ARGUMENTS
Preparing Good Arguments
Consider your Audience
Adjust to your Audience
Consider Opposing Arguments
Research an Argument
Organizing an Argument
Relevance (The Because Test)
Lists of Reasons For
Ill, Blame, Cure, Cost
Criteria
Chronology
Narrative
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence
Interpretive argument
Consider how you will Present your Argument
Conclusion
1-6
MAKING WELL SUPPORTED ARGUMENTS
Types of Support
Evidence Support
Interest Support
Using Pictures and Videos and
Physical Movement for Argument
Making Your Support Effective
Being Vivid
Developing your Logos
Developing your Ethos
Developing your Pathos
Using Effective Language
Reworking An
Argument
1-7:
ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT
The Burdens in an Argument
Presumption
Burden of Proof
Burden of Rejoinder
Burden of Rebuttal
Responding to Arguments
Rebuilding Arguments
Rebuttal
Distinguishing versus Combining
Comparisons
1-8
MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT ARGUMENTS
Decisionmaking Paradigms
Costs and Benefits
Hypothesis Testing
Gamesplayer
Narrative Paradigm
Skepticism toward Arguments
Tabula Rasa
Critic Of
Argument
Assessor
Punishment
Overall Skepticism towards Arguments
Presentational Style
Style Emphasis
Issues Emphasis
Arguments Emphasis
The Role of Ethos in Deciding
Morality
Aesthetics
Sincere Advocacy
Consequentialist versus Principled
Thinking
Consequentialist Thinking
Thinking based on Principles
Deciding how to decide
Articulating and Justifying a
Decision
1-9
USING GOOD REASONING AND AVOIDING FALLACIES
Reasoning
Causal reasoning
Sign Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Reasoning from Analogy
Argument from Authority
Argument from Definition
Logical Fallacies
How to show that an argument is not
well supported
Arguments that lack adequate proof:
Arguments that rest on faulty
proofs:
Point out that the source of the
evidence is poor:
How to prove that an argument isn’t
important:
How to prove that an argument
actually helps your case
Tip: Point out Logical Fallacies
accurately
Conclusion
1-10
ETHICAL ARGUMENT
Ethics in Preparing Arguments
Enhancing Human Dignity
Arguers as Lovers
Rapists
Seducers
Harrassers
Lovers
The Ideal Speech Situation
Impartial Rational Standpoint
Conclusion
Chapter
1 VALUE ARGUMENT
Understanding your Argument
Selecting a Value
Criteria
Defining Terms
Weighing Values
Value A Has Wider Implications than
Value B
Value A Is More Justified By the
Situation than Value B
Value A Is More Universal Than Value
B
Value A Is Instrumental To Value B
Value A Is More Specific Than Value B
Value A Is More Morally Justified
Than Value B
Casuistry
Relation to Ethics
Conclusion
Chapter
2 PUBLIC POLICY ARGUMENT
Policy Advocacy, the Fundamentals
The Proposal
Advantages
Responses to the Advantages
Developing an Advantage for a
Proposal
Responding to an Advantage:
PLAN DISADVANTAGES
Links
Impacts
Responding to a Disadvantage
Advocating a Counter-Proposal
Choose your Counter Proposal
Get supporting material for the
Counter Proposal
Responding to a Counter-Proposal
KRITIKS
Prepare a Kritik
Responding to Kritikal
Arguments
WEIGHING ISSUES
Congressional Argumentation
Committee Argumentation
Bargaining and Compromising
Activist Argumentation
Conclusion
Chapter
3 Political Campaign Argument
Campaign Argumentation
Positive and Negative Campaign Ads
Positive Ads
Negative Ads
Candidate Character
Political Debates: Before, During,
and After
Political Stump Speeches
Conclusion
CHAPTER 2-04: LEGAL
ARGUMENT
Writing
Legal Briefs
What
is a Legal Brief?
Tone
of the Brief
Format
of the Brief
Argument
Oral
Argument
Preparing
for Oral Argument
Preparing
for Questioning
Cross-Examination
Responding
to Objections
Making
Decisions in Law
Reasoning
by Example
Legal
Formalism
Legal
Realism
Political
Capital / Political Legitimacy Model
Writing
the Decision
CHAPTER 2-05: ARGUMENT
IN RELIGION
Some
Key Elements of Religious Argument
Argument
in Christianity
Personal
Faith
Argumentation
in Judaism
Argumentation
in Buddhism and Hinduism
Argumentation
in Islam
Sunni
argumentation
Shiite
argumentation
Philosophical
Arguments for Religion
Scientific
arguments for religion
Agnosticism
and Atheism
CHAPTER 2-06: SCIENCE
AND MATH ARGUMENT
Scientific
Argument
Arguing
Science in an Academic Environment
Background
Research
Developing
a Hypothesis
Demonstrating
Plausibility
Defining
Terms
Arguing
through Observable Results: The Scientific Method
Arguing
Science in Conversation
Demonstrating
Knowledge in the Field
Speaking
to the Audience
Mathematic
Argument
Mathematical
Logic
Mathematical
Language and Notation: Important Concepts
Conclusion
CHAPTER 2-07: ACADEMIC
ARGUMENT
What
Makes an Academic Argument?
Academic
Argumentative Writing
Academic
Presentations
What
are Academic Presentations
How
to Make Academic Presentations Effective
Teaching
as Argument
Teaching
as a Collaborative Activity
Practical
Application of Teaching as Argument
Using
Argument in Teaching
CHAPTER 2-08:
DISCUSSION/GROUP ARGUMENT
Composing
an Argument
Engaging
in Argument in the Group
Leadership
Styles
Staying
on Topic
Giving
Relevant Reasons
Conclusion
CHAPTER 2-09: CASUAL
ARGUMENT
The
matter at hand
Why
are we arguing?
Keeping
things personal
Keeping
things civil
Getting
through to a stubborn friend
Arguing
in groups
Remember:
Have Fun
CHAPTER 2- 10: ARGUING
ON THE INTERNET (BLOGS, WIKIS, CHAT SESSIONS, ETC.)
Don’t
Get Lost
Keeping
Focused
Contributing
Constructively
The
Question of Anonymity
Incorporating
other sources
Specific
online venues
Blogs
News
Commentary
Wikis
Forums/Message
Boards
Chat
Sessions
Chapter 3-1 SOCIALITY
AND ARGUMENT
Identification
and Division
The
Guilt Purification Cycle:
Argument
as Unification
Argument
as Performance
Content
versus Community
Chapter 3-2 DEMOCRACY
IN ARGUMENT
Traditional
Models of Participation
Alternatives
to Specialization
Fisher’s
Narrative Paradigm
Raj
Patel’s Approach
Friere’s Approach
Chapter 3-3 METAPHOR
IN ARGUMENT
Metaphor
as a Social Necessity
Metaphor
Shapes our Understanding of Argument
Analysis
of Metaphor’s Arguments
Cold
War and Terrorism Argument Metaphors
Cold
War Rhetoric Today
Metaphorical
Framework Implications
Chapter 3-4 GENDER
CHALLENGES TO ARGUMENT
Masculine
Conceptions of Argument:
Gender
Awareness in Argument:
Argument
as Compromise and Collaboration:
Advancing
Gendered Conceptions of Argument
Butler
Spivak
Chapter 3-5 POWER IN
ARGUMENT
Power
Relationships
Surveillance
and Biopower
Discourse,
Power, and Knowledge
The
Rhetorical Situation
Critical
Rhetoric
The
First, Second and Third Personas
Chapter 3-6 ARGUMENT
AND PSCYHOANALYSIS
What
is Psychoanalysis?
Lacan’s Subject
Lacan and Argument
Argument
and Jouissance
Zizek’s Interpretation of Argument
Liberatory Argument
Chapter 3-7 POST
STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES TO ARGUMENT
Ethics
and Subjectivity
Simulations
and hyperreality
Rhizomes
and desire
APPENDIX: RESEARCHING
ARGUMENTS
Using
the Library
Using
the Internet
Contacting
Experts
Ali Edwards
Eric Chalfant
John Henry Heckendorn
William James Taylor
Kathryn Starkey
Luke Sanford
Mike Meredith
Nigel Ramoz-Leslie
Tom Friedenbach.